<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Perfect Storm: Yahoo and Microsoft</title>
	<link>http://webliquidgroup.com/opinions/yahoo-and-microsoft-a-marriage-of-shareholder-convenience/</link>
	<description>Web Liquid provides return on investment focused consulting and online marketing for some of the world most recongnised brands.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Mulholland</title>
		<link>http://webliquidgroup.com/opinions/yahoo-and-microsoft-a-marriage-of-shareholder-convenience/#comment-5154</link>
		<author>Steve Mulholland</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 06:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://webliquidgroup.com/opinions/yahoo-and-microsoft-a-marriage-of-shareholder-convenience/#comment-5154</guid>
		<description>Google offers lifeline to Yahoo! following Microsoft bid

Campaign 08-Feb-08

Google has offered help to its rival Yahoo! by proposing a partnership between the two sites as a means of rebuffing Bill Gates' Microsoft's hostile £44.6 billion takeover bid for Yahoo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google offers lifeline to Yahoo! following Microsoft bid</p>
<p>Campaign 08-Feb-08</p>
<p>Google has offered help to its rival Yahoo! by proposing a partnership between the two sites as a means of rebuffing Bill Gates&#8217; Microsoft&#8217;s hostile £44.6 billion takeover bid for Yahoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Mulholland</title>
		<link>http://webliquidgroup.com/opinions/yahoo-and-microsoft-a-marriage-of-shareholder-convenience/#comment-5153</link>
		<author>Steve Mulholland</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 06:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://webliquidgroup.com/opinions/yahoo-and-microsoft-a-marriage-of-shareholder-convenience/#comment-5153</guid>
		<description>We pitched for YAHOO! at the tail end of 07. The engagement was for the B2B line of business which talked to people like us. We didnt win. I was not a happy bunny.
But, im never a happy bunny if i dont get what i want.
Microsoft on the other hand always get what they want.
I felt no shock whatsoever when news broke  of this merger. Now, you may say why i call it a merger? But its a perfect fit.
Lets see how they do... Its a fight for the homepage choice!
YAHOO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We pitched for YAHOO! at the tail end of 07. The engagement was for the B2B line of business which talked to people like us. We didnt win. I was not a happy bunny.<br />
But, im never a happy bunny if i dont get what i want.<br />
Microsoft on the other hand always get what they want.<br />
I felt no shock whatsoever when news broke  of this merger. Now, you may say why i call it a merger? But its a perfect fit.<br />
Lets see how they do&#8230; Its a fight for the homepage choice!<br />
YAHOO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
